At TheDailyContext, we’re all about giving you the real deal when it comes to bikes, electric bikes, motorcycles, and upcoming launches. We know how much you rely on us for accurate info—whether it’s the specs of a new e-bike or the launch date of an upcoming motorcycle—so we take fact-checking seriously. This policy explains how we make sure our content is trustworthy, written in a way that’s easy to understand and feels like a chat with a friend.
Our Commitment to Accuracy
We’re riders just like you, and we know how frustrating it is to read something that’s off or misleading. That’s why we’re committed to:
- Sharing only accurate, verified info about bikes and the biking world.
- Being transparent about where our info comes from and how we check it.
- Fixing any mistakes quickly and clearly, so you can trust what you read.
How We Fact-Check
Here’s the behind-the-scenes look at how we make sure our content is solid:
- Multiple Sources: Before we publish anything, we check at least two reliable sources. For example, if we’re writing about a new electric bike, we’ll look at the manufacturer’s official website, press releases, or trusted bike magazines. If sources don’t agree, we dig deeper or hold off until we’re sure.
- Primary Sources First: Whenever possible, we go straight to the source—like a bike company’s announcement or an industry report. If we’re covering an upcoming bike, we’ll check the brand’s website or reach out to their team for confirmation.
- Expert Input: For technical stuff (like battery range on an e-bike or engine specs on a motorcycle), we consult experts when we can. This might be a mechanic, a bike designer, or even a passionate rider with deep knowledge.
- Cross-Checking Dates and Specs: Bike launches and specs can change, so we double-check details like release dates, prices, and features before hitting “publish.” If something’s unconfirmed, we’ll say so in the article (like “rumored to launch in 2026”).
- Reader Feedback: You’re part of our fact-checking team! If you spot something that looks off, let us know, and we’ll investigate right away.
Correcting Mistakes
We’re human, and sometimes we might miss something. If we get it wrong, here’s what we do:
- Fix the error as soon as we find it or you point it out.
- Add a note to the article explaining what was wrong and how we fixed it (like “Correction: The launch date was listed as June but is actually July”).
- If the mistake is big, we’ll post a notice on our site or social media to make sure everyone knows.
Our Sources
We’re picky about where we get our info. Here’s what we rely on:
- Primary Sources: Official announcements from bike brands, press conferences, or product specs from manufacturers.
- Trusted Secondary Sources: Well-known bike blogs, magazines (like Cycle World or BikeRadar), or industry reports from places like Bloomberg or Reuters.
- Community Input: We love hearing from riders like you who share real-world insights, like how a bike performs on the road.
Transparency
If we’re not 100% sure about something (like a rumored bike feature), we’ll be upfront and say it’s unconfirmed. We won’t publish wild guesses or clickbait just to get attention. Our goal is to keep you informed with facts you can rely on.
Your Role
You’re a huge part of keeping TheDailyContext accurate. If you notice a mistake, have new info, or want to share your expertise (maybe you’ve test-ridden that new motorcycle we wrote about), email us at contact@thedailycontext.com. We’ll check it out and make things right if needed.
Thanks for trusting TheDailyContext to bring you the latest and greatest in the world of bikes. We’re here to keep you in the know, one ride at a time!